I have no idea whether the allegations of sexual assault, etc., made against Supreme Court nominee Hon. Brett Kavanaugh are true or not. I leave to the unassailable discretion of police and prosecutors whether they should be investigated or charged, and to the wise and august United States Senate whether he should be confirmed.
I must say, however, that the LSTC disappointed in Kavanaugh's public responses. Producing a milquetoast calendar from one's high school days and claiming one's prolonged virginity in response to allegations of being a drunk ravenous animal are not the way of the Million Dollar Express.
As this blog has attempted to make clear to our audience, the legal game is a lifelong bacchanalia for white collar elites who lack the personality and cunning to make it in business and/or the stomach and math skills to be a surgeon. If you got the chops and hit a stroke of luck or two - particularly if you avoid the fly-trap of actually trying to make it as a real lawyer - you can milk this racket dry and feel damned good about your gluttony while other well-dressed people lick your boots.
Judge Kavanaugh has so far played the game beautifully. White, male, DC to Yale and back, obviously affiliated but not overtly political, perpetually passing off polemics as brilliance to people still angry at the Bork confirmation hearing. He even got it once, when he was on the Ken Starr team pressing to ask the President about his sex life. Why stop now because of this brief fad of society actually doing something about male excess?
Why do we resist this last barrier? Why do we maintain the charade of prestige and integrity like a syphilitic hooker powdering herself? It's never been clearer that legal elites in America - and this is by no means limited to one political "side" - have only a superficial interest in justice, the law, or even legal philosophy. The whole point is to metaphorically wag one's genitalia in the faces of lessers, whether that be third-tier law students gunning for The Hague or the general public focusing on one or two pet issues.
Legal analysis isn't rocket science. On pure intellect or legal understanding, there are thousands of lawyers just as qualified as Judge Kavanaugh. What most of them lack is the whole package, the gravitas, the haircut. Kavanaugh has the pedigree, but I sense a failed understanding of the bigger picture. That isn't to condone any past wrongful conduct, but it speaks volumes that Kavanaugh elected to go with "that's not me!" instead of "who gives a shit?"
These people didn't care about the giant stack of unknown documents and opinions hiding in a White House vault. They don't and never were going to care about drunken teenage skylarkings/indiscretions/felonies. The Senate embraces the elite white collar white man bacchanalia. Why not you, too, Brett?
The biggest fear, of course, is that a Supreme Court Justice or nominee being held accountable for his behavior will lead to a rippling domino effect where law deans might also be held accountable for their decades of collective nonsense. And folks, I hate to burst your liberal bubbles, but we simply can't have that without a breakdown in our justice quotient.
Why are we even bothering with Supreme Court Justices any more? There are tons of legal AI platforms now and it should be fairly easy to switch the dial from "advocate" to "Supreme Court Justice." Get rid of the justices and instead just have 9 IT monitors. These monitors would not have to be legally trained and simply vote on every case "Fascist" "Conservative" "Moderate" "Liberal" "Socialist" (with "Fucking Crazy Fascist and "Fucking Nuts Socialist" on both extremes) and the Supreme AI would produce an averaged-out opinion accordingly.
ReplyDelete